BOARD DIVERSITY, SOCIAL CAPITAL AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN KENYA

Noah Chepkech, Doris Mbugua, Maina E. Kimani

Abstract


Competitive advantage is the unique combination of elements within the business model which enables a firm to better satisfy the needs in its environment, earning economic rents in the process. The objective of this study was to evaluate the mediating effect of social capital on the relationship between board diversity and competitive advantage of commercial banks in Kenya. Few commercial banks in Kenya especially tier one banks have gained competitive advantage compared to their peers in tier 2 and tier 3. Some tier 2 and 3 banks have experienced sudden unexpected systemic collapse with a number of mergers and buy-offs ensuing. Some studies have attributed the lack of competitive advantage in Kenyan commercial banks to violation of banking laws such as lacking board diversity. Other studies done on the effect of board diversity on competitive advantage have shown varying contradictory findings. This study postulates that social capital could be playing a mediating role in the nexus between board diversity and competitive advantage. The study was guided by stakeholder theory. The research adopted descriptive as well as correlational research designs. Target population for this research comprised the forty-two commercial banks operating in Kenya while the respondents were heads of corporate departments of these banks. The research approach was census survey which covered all the elements in the target population. Questionnaire was the tool of data collection. Reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed using Cronbach alpha. A reliability coefficient of 0.7 and above is the rule of thumb and was used as benchmark for approving the reliability of the instruments. SPSS was used to aid in data analysis. Data analysis of collected data involved a combination of descriptive and inferential statistics. Multiple regression analysis as well as Pearson product moment correlation analysis was utilized to test the nexus between the independent variables and the dependent variable. The variables were regressed using 5% significance level to find out the strength of the variables and direction of their relationship. Study results indicated statistically significant direct effect between board diversity and competitive advantage (β = .440, t = 8.571, p = .000). Furthermore, the study showed that social capital had a significant mediating effect on the relationship between board diversity and competitive advantage (M1 = .280, SE = .034, 95% CI = [.216, .351]). The study is of value to commercial banks in Kenya because the research has confirmed the mediating effect of social capital on the association between board diversity and bank competitive advantage. The banks might use the results of the study to design a framework that will catapult the bank to competitive advantage and in turn promote economic growth by adopting board diversity and social capital simultaneously to achieve competitive advantage.


Keywords: Competitive advantage, Board Diversity, Social Capital


Full Text:

PDF

References


Akintimehin, O.O., Eniola, A.A Alabi, O.J. Eluyela, F.D., Okere, W. & Ozordi, E. (2019). Social Capital and its Effect on Business Performance in the Nigeria Informal sector. Heliyon 5 (1).

Al-Matari, E.M., Fadzil, F.H., & Al-Swidi, A.K. (2014). The Mediating Effect of Board Diversity on the Relationship Between Board of Director’s Characteristics and Firm Performance in Oman: Empirical Study. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 21(5), 782-791.

Bart, C. & Mcqueen, G. (2013). Why Women Make Better Directors. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 8(1), 93 – 99.

Barreiro-Gen, M., Lozano, R., Temel, M., & Carpenter, A. (2021). Gender Equality for Sustainability in Ports: Developing a Framework. Marine Policy, 131(10), 45-93.

Bourdieu, P. (2014). The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups. Theorsoc 14(1), 723–744.

Carter, D.A., D'Souza, F., Simkins, B.J. & Simpson, G.W. (2010). The Gender and Ethnic Diversity of US Boards and Board Committees and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396-414.

CBK (2021). Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2020/2021. Central Bank of Kenya.

Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.

Freeman, R.E., Wicks, A.C. & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Objective Revisited. Organization Science 15(3), 364-369.

Green, C.P. & Homroy, S. (2018). Female Directors, Board Committees and Firm Performance. European Economic Review, 102(C), 19-38.

Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.

Herremans, I.M., Nazari, J.A. & Mahmoudian, F. (2016). Stakeholder Relationships, Engagement, and Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3-2), 417-435.

Jones, T. & Wicks, A. (1999). Convergent Stakeholder Theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 206-221.

Kılıç, M. & Kuzey, C. (2016). The Effect of Board Gender Diversity on Firm Performance: Evidence From Turkey. Gender in Management, 31 (7), 434-455.

Low, D.C.M., Roberts, H. & Whiting, R.H. (2015). Board Gender Diversity and firm Performance: Empirical Evidence From Hong Kong, South Korea, Malaysia and Singapore. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 35(A), November 2015, 381-401.

Ozigi, O. (2018). Social Capital and Financial Performance of Small and Medium Scale Enterprises. Journal of Advanced Research in Business and Management Studies 10 (1), 18-27.

Porter, M.E. (2021). The Changing Role of Business in Society. Working Paper, July 2021.

Rahman, M.M. & Saima, F.N. (2018). “Efficiency of Board Composition on Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence From Listed Manufacturing Firms of Bangladesh”, Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 5 (2), 53-61.

Singh, S., Tabassum, N., Darwish, T.K., and Batsakis, G. (2018). Corporate Governance and Tobin’s Q as a Measure of Organizational Performance. Br. J. Manag. 29, 171–190.

Wang D., Mei G., Xu X., Zhao R., Chen R., Qin X.& Hu Z. (2016). Chinese Non-Governmental Organizations In HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control: Intraorganizational Social Capital as a New Analytical Perspective. Bioscience Trends 10(5).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.